// 题目要求找「右侧第一个 ≤ cur」的元素 → 弹出所有 cur 的，栈顶即为折扣
高解析度的定义是高于标准 CD 音质（44.1kHz、16bit），但我这里的高解析度比正常的定义要严格一点，我再加上编码是无损的，因为前面对比过有损和无损的频谱了，我们下面分析是否真高解析度音频的时候，将默认编码都看作是真无损的。
。关于这个话题，搜狗输入法下载提供了深入分析
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Что думаешь? Оцени!